| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BC
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Michael Moore responds to the Bush Crime Family's hit sq |
 |
|
On May 14, 8:42 am, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
In article <1179144184.356503.161...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 7:19 pm, BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 10:56 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 10:04 am, "Adam Whyte-Settlar" <grawill...@westnet.com.au
wrote:
"Daniel" <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178984735.557701.139650@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 9:14 pm, "inkybla...@yahoo.com" <inkybla...@yahoo.com
wrote:
II love Michael Moore! He deserves a Nobel Prize in journalism!
I don't think they give one for fiction.
Scares you shitless that there is someone out there with the balls to
tell
the truth doesn't it.
What has Mr. Moore told the truth about?
http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/f911reader/index.php?id=16
That's hilarious, you use a Michael Moore website to try to prove he
told the truth.
BC likes to flaunt his stupidity.
|
If stupidity was a dress, you would be queen of the
ball.
-BC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BC
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Michael Moore responds to the Bush Crime Family's hit sq |
|
|
On May 14, 8:03 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 13, 7:19 pm, BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 10:56 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 10:04 am, "Adam Whyte-Settlar" <grawill...@westnet.com.au
wrote:
"Daniel" <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178984735.557701.139650@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 9:14 pm, "inkybla...@yahoo.com" <inkybla...@yahoo.com
wrote:
II love Michael Moore! He deserves a Nobel Prize in journalism!
I don't think they give one for fiction.
Scares you shitless that there is someone out there with the balls to tell
the truth doesn't it.
What has Mr. Moore told the truth about?
http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/f911reader/index.php?id=16
That's hilarious, you use a Michael Moore website to try to prove he
told the truth.
|
Unlike you and the other numbnut, Burton, Moore backs up
all his claims with sources and references. Go ahead, fool,
click that page and find something that Moore screws up on.
-BC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Day Brown
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: American Malaise |
|
|
| Quote: |
http://www.thirty-thousand.org/ is a good point to start. With
local politics. |
I have not seen The Economist in recent enough years to have an
opinion on it. Increasingly I see that transnationals are making deals
with local communities without the input from the feds, and that those
folks down home think more about their niche in the global market than
they do about what central planners have to say.
When the money is seen more directly, rather than filtered thru the
lobby and broker fog of DC and Wall Street, its easier for folks to
think. I grant that its something they've never done too well, but
suggest that the decline in academic test scores over the years proves
that its worse now. If you take a look at http://www.dc-pc.org/farmath/farmath.html
- you'll see a scan of an 1885 8th grade arithmatic book. A lotta kids
today would flunk.
Urbanization is part of the problem. The kind of local planning
needed, which the farm kids back then saw going on, made the utility
of the math they were learning obvious. There's no such motivation for
urban kids today. Today, the adults leave the kids to go to work. the
kids dont really know what work is. I was born on a farm, and by the
age of 10, was in the field with a fork in my hand, and got to know
what work was. Nowadays it would be called "child exploitation", but
at the time, I didnt see it that way. I was contributing the same as
the adults were, It was teamwork. It was also a valuable lesson kids
dont get today.
And while we worked, we got exercise, which we now know enhances
mental functioning. I heard them talk, planning how to get the job
done, what the weather would permit getting done, what other things
were on the agenda. *thinking* at work. If thinking were something
that most urbanites do well, then why were half of the Green Berets
raised on family farms? they are only 1% of the total population.
The CSPAN political strategy meetings I referred to were on about a
year ago. Before the election. Going on about poll numbers and sound
bytes. I am somewhat bemused to see them struggle with the asininity
of Creationism. You can pander to religious sensibilities, as Gibbon
mentioned the Roman aristocracy did, but it is more grease for the
slide to tyranny. Why would people who are waiting for "The Rapture"
giva fuck about the environment? In their view, the world is going to
hell anyway.
Its a chicken/egg problem. Wallace, in his Anthro classic "Culture and
Personality" noted that when a republic is on the skids and people's
coping skills dont work so well anymore, they engage in "magical
thinking". Like waiting for Jesus. Astrology. Tarot. Wicca.
"neopagans" whatever that means. Young men mindlessly spending endless
hours running & gunning on xbox. Or doing drugs. They dont have a
future, they aint so stupid they dont know that, so they get whatever
they can now.
So- if you add up all this dysfunctionality, you see that the republic
has no future. Which makes even more people even more insane. The only
people left who plan careers in the republic as neurotic zealots who
cannot see the downside to any of their proposals or partisanship. You
can lay out some moderate rational policy here, and much of what you
see in response is lame, but quick, comebacks and ad hominum, which
gets increasingly strident if it dont fit in their partisan
mindframe.
Other times, indicative of neurotic denial, the silence is just
deafening. For instance, the abortion debate is *over*. Plants evolved
a defensive technique of preventing herbivores from developing a taste
for them by causing sterility and abortions. If you read a herbal
manual, you'll find the warnings to women who mite get, or are,
pregnant. I grow several in my garden. There's a *reason* "Bachelor
Button" is so named, and women who are trying to reconstruct ancient
craft are finding out about it.
No appointment, no clinic, no protestor line, no adoption sermon, no
parental consent, no doctor bill, and no problems with pharmacists.
Nearly free abortion on demand, 1st, 2nd, or 3rd trimester that will
go on the books as a "miscarriage". It no longer *matters* what
SCOTUS, Fox News, Congress, or the state legislatures do or say. Much
less anything any fundy on line thinks. If any of them had read
history, they'd know that draconian policy has a habit of backfiring.
And in this case, empowering today's "witches".
Likewise, we can expect to see American terrorists organize to attack
transnational infrastructure that hires illegals. Even if arrested,
where can the feds find a jury that will convict? Just like a pending
execution, job losses will concentrate the minds, bringing sheeple out
of neurotic denial. Loosing a house in forclosure gets them off the
couch too, and will have the same effect.
The repercussions of the conflct between the neurotics with the power
structure behind them, and those awake to reality is unknowable. But
Gibbon said that "in confusing times, each active genius rises to its
place assigned by Nature." Rather than nepotism. A constitutional
convention would remove the glass ceiling imposed by the federal power
elite, but if not, well- there's always revolution to shatter it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Tag Heuer
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: I'm still waiting! Anyone got an example of GOOD NEWS in |
|
|
On 14 May 2007 10:21:34 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Mon, 14 May 2007 17:10:25 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14 May 2007 08:26:52 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 07:44:51 -0700, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14 May 2007 06:05:20 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 21:34:59 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 May 2007 14:06:31 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 16:06:08 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 May 2007 08:20:57 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:24:01 -0700, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 12:51:43 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 18:45:58 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 11:00:06 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:10:49 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 08:05:46 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:41:44 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9 May 2007 23:44:09 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 14:20:51 -0700, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9 May 2007 13:24:04 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 17:00:59 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9 May 2007 09:07:02 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 15:18:12 GMT, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9 May 2007 06:33:47 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 08 May 2007 14:51:49 -0700, Tag Heuer <tagheuerblog@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2007 13:25:03 -0700, firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
On May 8, 2:23 pm, "XTS" <x...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
Let's say even if they do build a new school. The school kids have to walk
through pools of blood, step over dead bodies and risk being blown to shreds
just to try to make it to the school.
The last one, certainly - as for the rest, I think you exaggerate overmuch. Do you
realize the size of Baghdad, and Iraq in general?
If I may, you are generalizing. And since we are, imagine the war in
Iraq occuring in a state about the same size, of say Texas. Imagine a
"Green Zone" right smack dab in the middle of say, Dallas with armed
militias and religious wackos warring with one another and placing and
detonating IEDs everywhere in a full blown sectarian war. . . A
horrifying thought isn't it?
His idea that every street in Baghdad is littered with
pools of blood and corpses - you think that's accurate?
I'm in no position to reply in agreement or to the contrary and I
cannot speak for XTS. And besides, from following the thread, XTS
doesn't "give a F&%K what you think," however the level of destruction
and violence and death in Iraq cannot be denied and that is my point.
It cannot be denied, no. However, it can be exaggerated,
and both you and XTS are quite willing to do so to the
terrorists' delight.
Apparently it is you who intends to "exaggerate" the "good news" from
Iraq, and to spin it in a manner that comes out appearing nothing
short of delusional. The "reality" of this Iraq war, based on fixed
intel and propaganda, is an urgent matter and something that you are
unwilling to accept. Instead, you come off with this "you are either
with us, or you are with the terrorist" Bush administration knee-jerk
propaganda, which has long since been debunked as nothing more than
fear-mongering and divisive means (targeting the American people) by
which to garner support for a war and justification which was built on
one lie after another.
You write this while leaping to the defense of someone
who thinks every street in Baghdad is continually strewn
with blood and body parts. Were you able to keep a
straight face while doing so? I suppose I could suck on the
teat of propaganda spin you've chosen instead. Nice canned
spiel. I'll bet you actually believe it describes someone in the
real world, too.
It is apparent that you haven't the capacity to rationally digest or
even comprehend the facts presented to you, as you desperately
back-pedal to a previous point which was already address, and where
YOU were left to respond with some intelligible off-the-wall kneejerk.
Again, I cannot speak for XTS however my point stands - The level of
violence and destruction and death and mayhem and lawlessness and
terror in Iraq cannot be easily swept-under-the-rug and minimized, and
or to the point trivialization by the "propaganda" that you and the
rest of the conservative chimps in the MSM howl in unison -
Furthermore, welcome to the real world and stop smoking . . . Err,
'keep of the grass.'
In that case, aren't you wasting your time presenting them?
Or is it actually the case that your only reason for typing these
"facts" is that you're addicted to your own spew? I love the way
you descend into incoherency when your venom spew is ineffectual.
Interesting that you view any attempt to present Iraq as anything
less than a 24/7 bloodbath as "trivializing" what they're going
through. You demand that the world exist as the extremes
your propaganda porrige has fed you, and scream at anyone
who doesn't suck the same slop you feed upon. I disgree with
you, so I must be on drugs? That was the best you could do?
Considering the rest of your post, apparently that *was* the best
you could do. Your mother must be so proud.
Now, now. I'll accept the the fact, that points that I've raised are
of no consequence to you since you haven't the gumption to accept
them; and out of sheer ignorance of the "facts" it is clear that these
are beyond your deranged level of comprehension which is without doubt
a component of being an absolute Chimp-hugger. The immoral state of
what this Bush administration stands for is to date supported by
hard-core mental masturbation cretins such as yourself, whose minds
are filled with "mush" from the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, and the
rest of the howin' chimps in the MSM, and who delude themselves to the
point of "incoherency," since "reality" in these days of corruption,
treason, lies, and downright criminal behavior are factors which are
far too overwhelming to grasp, or even to accept, with the limited
capacity to understand - Another reason for this will be illustrated
shortly. Furthermore, it is YOUR "trivializing" of the war, as well
as the fabrication, or illusion that you and that monkey in the
Whitehouse are trying to create in that "great PROGRESS is being made"
in this war when all indications from independent sources, witnesses,
and the international community of humanitarian efforts say otherwise,
is what should be addressed here. Apparently, YOU applaud the
atrocities of Abu Graib; You applaud the manner in which this war came
to be; You applaud each "mistake" made in this war, and you support
and cheer when our troops sent into this "terror" that Bush created in
this country, and celebrate each and every Iraqi civilian death as
though it was some sort of "benchmark" towards progress.
Tag, you're far too drowned in propaganda to even know what a fact is,
much less raise one. Yes, you went on to spew a long diatribe about
Chimp-hugging and who I *must* be listening to on the radio, all the nice
comfortable stereotypes you've fed yourself about what people who disagree
with you *must* be like - and while seeing the world in such childishly simplistic
terms, congratulating yourself on what you see as your depths of insight and
perception. How absolutely, positively perfect. ;-)
Come now ;-) You know as well as I do that you never had a point to
begin with - Or at least one you could 'coherently' support, with the
limited cranial capacity you possess. And you know as well as I do
that it was your intention to fabricate some rosey picture of Iraq,
and of which John McCain tried to do some weeks back as well when he
suggested that the streets of Baghdad were safe to "stroll" through.
But to this point, I have no qualms with your lack of understanding,
or even ignorance in all of this. I do however take exception to your
intent to decieve and "catapult" the "propaganda" in the context of
our exchange and when our troops are dying for a "mission" and a war
that was built on lies and deceit to begin with - Besides IMHO it is
the moral thing to do with immorality running roughshod over my
country's government, and when it is time to can the bullsh%t and to
bring forth the certain facts. Your 'spin' OTOH is revealing and I
look forward to dissecting it for what it is worth.
Certainly not a point that mattered to your life of
obsessive venom-spew. I questioned XTC's
description of Baghdad with every street
continually strewn with body parts, and you're
inane enough to think I'm painting a "rosy
picture" - and you went downhill from there,
all the while certain of your own intellectual
superiority.
On the contrary. It was you . . . Please scroll up . . . Who tossed
out that red-herring of a reply, and in rhetoric, in trying to get me
to speak on behalf of XTS, (with your obvious drug inference duly
noted and hence what appears to consume you, and not so much the other
way around). Furthermore, it is indeed "downhill" from here in
continuing this exchange with you since to this point you have little
to nothing to support your baseless claims regarding the situation in
Iraq and in and of this war, and the hilarious manner in which you are
attempting to spin it. It certainly isn't a very good tact at all . .
. In fact, as we shall see in continuing this, as 'hope springs
eternal,' you will provide something that is worth declaring, and that
which shall without any reasonable doubt capture the essense of your
ignorance and idiocy on this subject.
After your repeated floods of venom spew,
the height of your intellectual capability boils
down to "I know you are but what am I".
How delightfully droll.
Do you actually know what a Usenet, Internet or even an e-mail "flood"
is? Or are you misleading yourself into believing in something that
you've concocted in that warped skull of yours that fits whatever
limited understanding you have of what is being transcribed on this
thread? - No strike that. It is certainly clear to me you have no
clue whatsoever of what you are trying to communicate. Instead I've
limited you to 2 or 3 sentence replies which is far beyond the pale of
coherence to anyone above the kindergarten level of education. In
fact it's is nothing but gibberish, and presumably the language of
Chimps . . . The very same dialect and tone that the Commander and
Chimp in the Whitehouse employs when he tries to express even a simple
thought. Get the idea? Furthermore, and again this is remeneiscent
of when you suggested that Prescott Bush (George W. Bush's grandpappy)
was on dictator Adolph Hitler's "hit-list," in "the late 30's" for
either assassination, or conversely, Herr Fueher's favorite
business-fiddles song and or dance. Which of course certainly
underscores your own propensity to toss revisionist falsehoods, as you
are now so doing on this thread. Nevertheless, it's clear that you do
not possess one iota of clear thought, and that you are wrestling with
yourself to find some common ground with your acceptance and approval
of a Chimp who has led our military into disaster, and this country
into yet another - And for which YOU salute and take pride in doing in
deranged promotion of such immoral and corrupt decay of this
government's leadership - And at the same time suggesting that the bad
news out of Iraq is "exaggerated." Surely, and given all this, it is
you who is adept in hyperbole and even without having to think about
it.
I know that with a minor quip on my part, you can be
easily prompted to post page upon page of vitriol. That
amuses me - especially since you think you're actually
saying something important, somewhere in those
rambling paragraphs that flood from your fingers.
"Minor quip?" LOL That is quite an understatement. It's whatever it
is that you are "mainlining" that has you 'quipping' mindlessly and in
tangent throughout all this. And frankly, the 'amusement' is all mine
since what we have here is YOU . . . A Chimp-hugger of galactic
proportions who has gone to great lengths in brown-nosed support of
that miscreant knuckledragger in the Whitehouse, and without one point
to stand upon regarding the "good news in Iraq," which you have
completely failed to spin in hyperbole. Furthermore, it is clear that
certain neurons are seriously misfiring, and to the point of
experiencing a major malfunction with your own "fingers" pitifully
trying synch with that deranged and warped noodle of yours in offering
something, anything that is plausibly coherent or even comprehensible.
And again, it is definitely what you are abusing that has you going
from one incoherent and pointless reply to another. Now, please let's
have this "good news."
Oh, my writings here have certainly been minor - that's
all it takes to set you off, and I pride myself on efficiency.
You post and repost your own crap, imagining that
someone besides yourself actually read it. I write
five lines expressing my amusement, and you write
paragraph upon paragraph, unrelated to anything
anyone else has written, simply because you love
your own blather. You're the best Usenet street
theater I've seen in weeks, and considering the
whackadoodles you're competing with, that's
quite an accomplishment. Bravo!
But of course your limited grasp of points raised are as brief and
limited as your understanding of them - The narrowest of minds could
only hold in "shock and awe." And what you equate as "efficiency" is
nothing more than some self-deluded grandeur induced by some
controlled or even illegal "mainlined" substance which I have proven
time and again over the course of our exchange. And it is also
evident that what ever you personify as the most rabid Chimp-hugger
that I've met to date out here, cannot be compared to the sheer
ignorance of the facts, which you cannot accept. Furthermore, the
entertainment value alone is enough to continue with this. So go on
ahead, and try to construct something witty or even intelligible and
try not to go into some hideous cranial-rectal inversion as you've
done time and again throughout this thread - And apparently, and in
some degenerate and repugnant sense of anticipation, the mere thought
of such a contortion is of "good news" to you.
It's hilarious that you see your pointless rehashing of
tired old propaganda as "raising of points", Tag.
The only thing "raised" is your ire at the fact that your
venom spews are nothing more to me than the screams
of an incensed monkey. Want a peanut?
Have a quick glimpse in the mirror, for YOU are the Chimp licker who
like Dick "F&%k Urself Shoot 'em In The Face" Cheney and the rest of
the turd picking criminal Chickenhawk miscreants in this Bush
administration, including '08 Presidential candidate John McCain, have
continued without too much success with exception to deranged
individuals such as yourself, to paint some rosey picture of Iraq, and
that which it is not. And like these 'dick'heads, you are without
question continuing with the propaganda of deceiving the American
people of how some sort of "progress" is being made in this not-so
"Mission Accomplished," as it is clear that which is all based on
deceit and the very same crap that got us into Iraq to begin with.
Tag, you've already used "I know you are but what am I". That,
and you've already spewed your canned rant about what I must
believe, what I must intend, and all the other ways I must cleave
to the cartoon caricature cabal you've created in your head and
deluded yourself into seeing as the real Bush, Cheney & Co. You
howl and scream, and I point and laugh - which is exactly as
it should be.
I see you can't bring yourself to accept the fact that you are
delusional in failing time and again to address the points that I've
raised - And I guess things didn't go too well yesterday with your
"mother" on this special day? Not the 'way things oughta be,' huh?
How could it since for all your projections and self-loathing, it's
clear that you are without doubt miserable in you deranged station in
life. In fact, I find it quite entertaining that you certainly have
this affinity for a certain "character" in the way of Paul Reubens -
http://tinyurl.com/yp2hmh - Do you not? For in digesting all that
I've presented to this point, the imagry of THIS 'caricature' leaps
into this little warped mind mind of yours, and this all comes with
little surprise as to why.
The only "delusion" is your expectation that I'd bother to read
your canned rants, Tag. The only "failure" here is your inability
to raise yourself to a level above that of a screaming monkey.
|
Whoa. Touched a nerve with that one, did I? LOL Two sentences which
doesn't come close to the point I raised regarding your 'proud'
appreciation of Reubens, huh? Your "mother's day?" Come now. LOL -
What a deranged 'mainlining' delusional basket case you are, to even
think that anything that I've been slapping you around with here is
"canned."
This is the real-time deal and you are now down to two-sentenced
rectal - cranial inverted replies which have no bearing whatsoever to
any point you are trying to make in demonstrating that there is
certainly and plenty of "GOOD NEWS in IRAQ. And to think you thought
it was all about some hyperbolic effort, when in fact and to this
point your "spin" has not only gone off axis, but completely off the
rails and into the gutter of strict denial over the deaths of our
troops which apparently you've spun to this point in hideous applause
.. . . And so long it isn't you in that casket, or at Walter Reed
preping for prosthetics or some life enduring trauma. No, you are far
too gone as a human to understand the suffering of not only our troops
but of those Iraqis whom you'd no soon wish to have wiped from the
face of this earth for one lie, based upon another in a deranged
effort to conceal the first.
Now drop the needle which you rely on as some crutch, and
prostheticize your brain with a dose of reality. And please, dignify
this exchange and tell me, just what is "GOOD NEWS in IRAQ?" And
spare us the abbreviated and blithering Bush licking sychophantic line
of rhetorical turd, why don't you?
| Quote: |
Yes. "Laugh" it up. Presumably you and he have a much in common,
given your own presumed and evidently disturbed up bringing, for your
personification of this individual is not as uncanny, as it is
downright hilarious. However, it is quite clear just where your
confusion in this exchange or anything else of importance clashes with
your sad misperception of reality, and especially where the
unwarranted death and destruction of our troops and military are
concerned.
Again, and as I requested before you knee-jerked into some incoherent
reply in a clear back pedal of you tooting your little horn on your
clown-like festooned bicycle, please provide under no uncertain
terms, any if at all, of "GOOD NEWS in IRAQ"
How you can go through life living and propagating this lie is beyond
anyone, but what I have 'accomplished' is nailing down a deranged Bush
huggin' sychopant whose delusion knows no bounds and that this
"rehashing" of each and every fallacy, lie, and misconception
regarding this war in error which is now seeing hundreds and thousands
of our troops being killed daily and for a lie which you have no
problem with. What I firmly suggest, and that which you need to do is
shed the pointless imbecilic replies, and to go on a number of Iraq
veterans blogs and websites, for and against the war, to even get a
clue. Because to this point you never had one and probably never will
given what ever it is you are intraveneously "mainlining,"
figuratively and from whom in the AM conservative hate talk radio, the
MSM and press, Fox News, and in reality - And it is beyond pathetic .
. . It's reprehensively, repulsively and repugnantly quite Republican
of you. Live with it because you and that monkey in the Whitehouse,
who is still looking for his own "nut" and a clue wear well.
Please return with whatever it is you can in terms of "GOOD NEWS in
IRAQ."
" . . . All right. You've covered your ass, now . . . " - George W.
Bush, telling an analyst after having received the PDB, Crawford,
Texas, August 6, 2001 - http://tinyurl.com/yttomj
" . . .I hope you leave here and walk out and say, 'What did he say?'"
—George W. Bush, with 2nd thoughts about what he actually told the
audience, Beaverton, Oregon, August 13, 2004
http://tinyurl.com/czrmd
In the meantime "I'm still waiting," to obtain what you do know
whatever it is YOU are talking about in the context of Iraq, the war
and that Chimp because to this point it is entertaining drivel which
of course offers a glimpse of the psychosis that has gripped those who
continue to support Bush in this matter that was based on PROPAGANDA,
deceit, plunder, and treason itself. Now please, provide the "good
news in Iraq," because to this point you come off simply soundling
like that Chimp with his head so far up his rectum, 'he needs to fart
in order to breathe.'
|
| Quote: |
" . . .See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over
and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult
the propaganda." — George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005 -
http://tinyurl.com/2e7s63
Yes, it is apparent that you've 'gone off the tracks' and aren't fit
for society, and should be committed. Also, in terms of 'drug abuse,'
please scroll down (if you've the ability) and accept the fact that
YOU raised this topic in reply first. Don't remember? Of course,
you don't . . . Point established. Furthermore, and in clear
projection of some disturbed or even abusive upbringing you really
need to keep your parent(s) out of this exchange - It only comes
across as a weak-ass rebut. Because, "yo' mama," is not a 'coherent'
thought, or even come-back, nor does it support whatever point you are
trying to make.
Yet, I have to this come to understand the delusions and the psychosis
which most of you Bush-huggers are experiencing these days, and in a
word it is certainly 'pathetic.' However, I look forward to your
return and reply when you sober up a bit, in order to continue with
this analysis.
Now in the "context" of 'Good News in Iraq,' there presumably
(objectively speaking) are instances of it:
- When an IED turns out to be a dud and doesn't go off and take out a
number of our troops on patrol
Or when Iraqi security forces catch the bombers in the
act of setting it, tipped off by civilians who hate the
terrorists more than you think they hate Bush. That's
happening, again and again - but cameras don't get
pointed at it, it doesn't fit the story the MSM thinks
should be told.
Actually, the potential of death of our troops presumably doesn't
settle well with whatever "good news" comes from the Whitehouse, Faux
News, or any of the "MSM" conservative Chickenhawk cheerleaders at
this point in the fight, as I am sure there are many instances of such
events having gone un-reported even by them.
The moment someone starts in with "Chickenhawk", my
opinion of them as a rational thinker goes down several
notches. The thinking that makes someone squawk
"Chickenhawk", if it were actually believed, would also
lead them to think that you can't have an opinion on
politics unless you're a politician.
It is not so much being a politican, but a VETERAN who knows the very
meaning of the term and especially when hypocrisy and honor and duty
to country and war called VIETNAM is concerned - And were certain
emotions are raised when it comes to sending another generation of
young Americans to battle by one who went AWOL to begin with.
" . . . The use of the term chickenhawk to describe a "hawk" who has
never been in combat became more popular when members of the "Baby
Boom" generation who had not served in the Vietnam War began entering
national politics. Dan Quayle, a "hawkish" conservative Republican,
was George H. W. Bush's running mate in the 1988 presidential
election. In the campaign, Quayle was criticized for having used
family connections to get into the Indiana National Guard in 1969,
allegedly in order to avoid going to Vietnam. As Vice President,
Quayle became the object of frequent ridicule in popular media;
references describing him as a "chicken hawk" can be found in
newsgroup archives from 1990 . . . One popular joke from this time,
playing on the fact that "Quayle" and "quail" are homophones, was:
Question: what do you get when you combine a chicken with a hawk?
Answer: a Quayle . . ." - Wikipedia
Now let's look at this from a "literal" perspective, shall we?
Chickenhawk n. A person enthusiastic about war, provided someone else
fights it; particularly when that enthusiasm is undimmed by personal
experience with war; most emphatically when that lack of experience
came in spite of ample opportunity in that person’s youth; Those who
were firm supporters of the Iraq war include: George W. Bush, Dick
Cheney, Karl Rove, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Bill Bennett,
Newt Gingrich, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Michael
Savage, Joe Scarborough, and George W. Bush, just to name a few.
Ah, now you're a "veteran" who can spell things with
ALL CAPS. I'm suitably impressed, I assure you.
You've chosen to live in a country where the civilians
make the decisions for the military. You look like
an idiot when you demand that civilians making such
decisions join the military or shut up - and *that's*
how the "Chickenhawk" epithet is being used
around here, sunshine.
If you accept it as an EPITHET then you have dignified the term - Go
figure that one out and get back to me if you've the intelligence to,
which I doubt. And as far as being a "veteran" and one who has seen
what war does first hand, you can be assured that neither your
arm-chair analysis of this war in Iraq nor those CHICKEN HAWKS in this
Bush administration will atone for the "hell" that they brought to
another country, and at the same time imperiling, sacrificing and
depleting OUR military in a war that was nothing but a LIE and for
nothing short of plunder - And you, if I recall are quite proficient
in propagating such falsehoods in delusional "teat-sucking" defense of
that Chimp in the Whitehouse
- When an hour goes by without the drone of a US military aircraft
seeking "terror"
Nice use of quotes to pretend that what's happening
is something else than what's really happening. A
band of thugs blow up a marketplace to try and cause
political change through use of applied fear - what
else would you call it but terrorism?
It is a sectarian civil war based on "terror," and which we are smack
dab in the middle of, where (here are some more quotation marks which
you appear to enjoy) "law and order" is little to none when it comes
to the "thugs" who've taken this opportunity to promote their agenda.
But one in tangent is avoiding the point that the country is at war
and the continuous "drone" of military aircraft; the whistle of A/G
ordnance; the sound of gunfire or even artillery fire; the screams of
"terror" after a "marketplace" has been blown to smithereens and with
bodys and limbs strewn everywhere with "pools of blood"; the sirens of
the ambulances and the confused yet coordinated yells from those
trying to recover survivors; are in fact sounds, like the "drone" of
US miltary aircraft that go hand-in-hand. Again. It's "war." And
George W. Bush's war on Iraq.
George Bush isn't blowing up marketplaces, Tag. And,
contrary to what the media shows you and what you
want to believe, this war isn't 24/7 on every block of
Baghdad, much less throughout Iraq.
Of course he wouldn't dare return to Iraq to "blow up" a market place.
He's clearly and to this point the cause of this sectarian civil war,
and with our troops caught in the middle. Furthermore, and apparently
you aren't up on current events which include "schools" as well:
" . . . An attack by a US helicopter against suspected insurgents in
Iraq has killed a number of children at a primary school, Iraqi
security sources say. The attack took place in Diyala province
north-east of Baghdad, the sources say. A spokesman for the US
military said there had been helicopter activity in the area but he
was not able to confirm any other details . . ." - Source: BBC
05/08/07 - http://tinyurl.com/2efwp4
So much for YOUR "good news."
- When a curfew is imposed to limit the casualties of a intelligence
report that an attack is imminent
- When for maybe an for an hour the electricity returns long enough to
enjoy certain appliances (air conditioners) and amenties of domestic
life
- When it is safe to go to the market or anywhere else without fear of
terrorist act, death or violence
When it for a fleeting and brief moment . . . The world around is
quiet and still and the sound of crickets, or a baby's cry to be fed,
a dogs playful bark, or children laughing in the still of the night
are welcome sounds.
But of course the answer to question depends upon who one asks there
in Baghdad, Iraq - http://tinyurl.com/eaqpz . . . And not those from
the Fox News Network, NRO, or any of the howling AM conservative radio
'cheerleaders.'
You've convinced yourself that Baghdad is an unending
hell, that's for sure. The terrorists thank you for your
support.
Here is a clue - The "terrorist" want YOU there and Bush is playing
right into their hands by being in THEIR house and in THEIR yard and
in THEIR country trying to spread this 'delusional' notion of Western
freedom which HE feels he can impose on a country, if not region -
under the guise of some "War President," and "The Decider" (looking
for a scapegoat in the way of a 'War Czar') just because he says so.
Furthermore, and apparently you cannot seem to comprehend or even
fathom the insanity which George W. Bush has brought upon the Iraqi
people, and which you attempt to justify with this nonsense over "good
news," when death and destruction are matters that you are willing to
ignore.
Save your condecension for someone who looks up to you - if there is
anyone. <Ranting screed about the EEEVIL of George Bush snipped,
because that's about the best use for such tripe
Sure. "Cut and run," when confronted with the reality and totality of
the point, and the living "hell" that Bush created in Iraq for her
people. You are certainly a credit to Bush's depraved and immoral
effort to promote this war for what it is not. But more importantly I
hope this thread helps in your better understanding of just what the
"Good News" is, and what it stands for in this context in and of
George W. Bush's Iraq War of 2003-? and of his "legacy."
Nah, I just don't have much interest in reposting your
screeds to the Internet, especially when they're already
enshrined in Usenet archives for any interested party
to read. Who's murdering the Iraqi people, Tag? You'd
like to believe it's Bush, and that things would get better
if the US pulled out...but that's what I'd expect of you. Just
as you are a credit to the terrorists who desperately want
you and yours to believe the worst of Iraq, every step of the
way. You really think that your spewed venom will convince
anyone who isn't already mainlining your brand of koolaide?
Damn, how do you fit that ego of yours inside buildings?
Please spare the off-the-wall evasive if not mindless rhetoric, why
don't you? And stick to the point. You snipped because you cannot
address the point(s) raised. In resignation you go into this
contorted rectal-cranial inversion and offer one tangent after another
in advocating, in screed, that it is just fine with you to deceive the
American people in going to war, which for all intents Bush did.
Furthermore, and speaking of the Usenet, it is clear to me, that I'm
dealing with the very same BUSH HUGGER who in a revisionistic and
propagadistic fit declared:
"... His grandfather was a stockholder in a company that did business
with Germany before the war, just like every international business in
the US during the 1930's. His company's closest contact with the
Hitler regime was on Hitler's hit list by the end of the 1930's . . ."
"Every business?" Yes. That's right, and just what "business" are
you in, may I ask? - No, forgive me that was rhetorical as it is quite
obvious where your M.O. lies. For you were the one who in the face of
the fact that the U.S. Government in 1942, and well into WWII, shut
down Bush's grandfather's business under the 'Trading with the Enemy
Act,' went on a limb and attempted in deceit to revise history and
just like you are doing now with regard to the "good news" out of
Iraq.
Now regarding your deranged inference to abuse, your irrational points
in opinion over the severity of the Iraq war is misguided as you are
misinformed, ignorant as you are un-read of the facts presented to
you, and completely detached from reality which may be the result of
some illegal or even controlled substance. Therefore, do seek help
before you hurt yourself.
Saddam Hussein isn't available to put things back
the way you'd like them to be. Who's your next
candidate?
Non-sequitur, irrelevant and rhetorical. Hussein kept a lid on the
sectarian violence by a murderous brutal totalitarian rule - Which is
to say that until he was removed we did not see the 'mass
destruction,' un-checked terror, and wholesale slaughter of and by
Iraqis that we do now in terms of Bush's occupation of Iraq. In fact,
he spurned Al Qaeda and had nothing to do with the fabricated
intelligence over Yellow Cake uranium sale from Niger. Now, consider
former Secretary of State Colin Powell's "Pottery Barn Rule," that
Bush out of sheer incompetence, ignorance and presumable criminal
intent disregarded.
You don't like what was done, therefore you want
what was before to have continued. Unless you
have another choice in mind?
Hindsight is 20/20 and to this point it's been one big FUBAR f&%kup
from the get-go AFAIK, for the point of the matter it is not so much
how we got there, but what is keeping us there and the "good news"
which may be few and far between. Therefore, please accept it, and
the fact that the "justificaton" war and some crazy "Mission
Accomplished" was based on lies and deceit and propaganda - And we as
a nation are going to pay for it in one way or another.
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently
sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." — George W.
Bush, SOTU, January 28, 2003, lying to the American people and making
|
http://tagheuerblog.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Patriot Games
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Do you love high gas prices? Then bomb Iran and they wi |
|
|
"Jones" <Jones@jones.com> wrote in message
news:Lm%1i.5728$dd.5535@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
| Quote: |
Patriot Games wrote:
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjv@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:s%X1i.9854$Ut6.563@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hbq1i.605$145.72@trnddc02...
inkyblacks@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179002053.204533.71510@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Do you love high gas and food prices? Then let idiot George W.
Bush bomb Iran! If we attack Iran, not only will terrorism
increase
It will have no affect on terrorism except to keep terrorists from
getting nuclear weapons.
but food and gas prices will go through the roof
Wrong, we would control the Straits of Hormuz, there would be NO
impact on oil.
Wrong, we don't get ANY food from Iran.
and stock prices will crash, crash, crash!
With the fear of a nuclear weaponed Iran ELIMINATED stock prices
would GO UP.
Sound good?
Yes!
Death to Iran!
Bomb Iran NOW!
Of course this pervert never, ever served.
Vietnam. 1968. Eight years.
You?
He's happy to direct our soldiers but he's not gonna go over there.
I volunteered after 9/11 but they said I was too old.
Was that deferment known as 4F by any chance?
|
It was a letter hand-signed by Rumsfeld that (paraphrased) said thanks for
my previous service and have a nice day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Patriot Games
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Do you love high gas prices? Then bomb Iran and they wil |
|
|
"Jones" <Jones@jones.com> wrote in message
news:Zj%1i.5727$dd.2341@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
| Quote: |
Patriot Games wrote:
"Jones" <Jones@jones.com> wrote in message
news:yDH1i.5699$dd.4774@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
Patriot Games wrote:
"Jones" <Jones@jones.com> wrote in message
news:N8t1i.5683$dd.532@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
until war criminals are exterminated...
Feel free to try anytime....
Death to Iran!
Bomb Iran NOW!
Why do you love terrorism and hate Americans?
You have it backwards. But you anti-war Socialists usually do.
You are advocating the US bombs another country that has poses no threat
to America or any other country.
|
No, you're wrong. They are intent on making nuclear weapons and that makes
them a threat to most of the world.
| Quote: |
You are the number one reason America and Bush have reached such a level
of hate around the world that has never been known before.
|
We don't care.
| Quote: |
You are a pathetic Nazi.
|
You are pathetic bedwetting coward. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Can Muslims be trusted? |
|
|
On May 11, 5:32 am, "simple_langu...@yahoo.com"
<simple_langu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
source:http://allaboutmuhammad.com/page13.html
In the United States, since we have only an estimated 1.5 to 2.0
million Muslims, Dar Al-Sulh still predominates, but the seeds of our
society's destruction are already well sown. Any Muslim, if called
upon to commit a treasonous act by his imam, against his host country,
is faced with the choice of being an apostate in the eyes of his
religion, or a traitor to his adopted country. Faced with this
choice, many will become traitors! Regardless of any affection a
Muslim might feel towards the society of his adopted country,
accepting the consequences of a charge of sedition or treason, in our
world-wide politically correct society, would, for most Muslims, be
considerably less consequential than betrayal of Islam.
|
Wrong question...
The US should never have put itself into a position where it has to
trust any foreign nation or foreign allegiance.
Why did you let those people into the US if you don't trust them
anyway?
Feel-good ideology? Or was it just the neocon bucks to be made off of
cheaper labor?
Assuming things are as bad as you say... it means that the police will
have to be more busy than ever.
And it should also indicate that the influx of foreign types whose
allegiance is questionable should be stopped.
Yes? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BC
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Michael Moore responds to the Bush Crime Family's hit sq |
|
|
On May 14, 6:55 am, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
In article <1179113471.058964.207...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 9:32 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
In article <1179106228.084170.246...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 8:39 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
In article <1179097551.416509.317...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 5:33 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
In article <1179075029.234931.327...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 13, 11:42 am, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com
wrote:
In article
1179069023.818882.317...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 12, 8:47 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com
wrote:
In article
1178985878.818920.178...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 12, 11:45 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com
wrote:
On May 11, 9:14 pm, "inkybla...@yahoo.com"
inkybla...@yahoo.com
wrote:
II loveMichaelMoore! He deserves a Nobel Prize in
journalism!
I don't think they give one for fiction.
If they did, Fox News would win every year...
...in a very tight race with NBC, ABC, CBS, Washington
Post,
Boston
Globe, and LA Times.
Nope. Fox News way ahead
Nope, it's pretty much a tie, although the had been way ahead
in
years
past.
Duh, no:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Fox_News
Sourcewatch is a left-wing organization that spends it's time
attacking
conservative writers. Try again, fool.
Translated: "Sourcewatch carefully footnotes and
sources everything...
You wish, lotta unsupported claims, nothing more. Try again.
Lotta? Name just one that's unsupported.
I already did.
I guess Google Groups didn't pick that one up...
If you say so.
|
The only thing for certain is that you talk the talk,
but take a walk when anyone asks to back up
any of your standard issue, right wing BS.
-BC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BC
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Michael Moore responds to the Bush Crime Family's hit sq |
|
|
On May 14, 6:55 am, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
In article <1179111153.302039.268...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
BC <callm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Who's whining now?
You are.
|
How about the full quote:
"Who's whining now? Blah, blah, blah...put up or shut
up."
Again, put up or shut up.
-BC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Patriot Games
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Check Out This Fake Poll Found Exclusively on a Blog Re: |
|
|
"SilentOtto" <silentotto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179156409.705319.165380@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On May 14, 9:55 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com> wrote:
tom...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1179071885.711638.254750@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On May 13, 8:19 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com> wrote:
tom...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1179005120.438314.101770@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 1:07 pm, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com> wrote:
tom...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1178995740.377432.45680@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 11:26 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com
wrote:
tom...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1178983668.881266.109080@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 7:06 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com
wrote:
tom...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1178904263.885322.176400@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 10:13 am, "Patriot Games"
Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com
wrote:
tom...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1178901803.197232.143340@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 11, 8:02 am, "Patriot Games"
Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com
wrote:
What do you call
this:http://www.pollingreport.com/immigration.htm
?????
I call it a link to polls on imigration (no mention of
the
subject
of
your header)
Oops! That was a leftover from a previous post.
That entire site does not link to a CNN Poll showing the
data
you
pretend to be valid. I'm sure you can come up with it
through
a
quick
search of CNN polls, though, right?
Its the first one on the List of Iraq Polls.
'SilentOtto' managed to find it easy enough. Maybe he's
just
smarter
than
you?
Without links, or corroberating evidence from the
alleged
source,
what
evidence is there that the "pollingreport" web page has
any
validity
anyway? Is it a blog?
Go find out.
I actually found the stat's listed on the blog a LONG time
before
either you or Otto did.
So, when you said "the data you pretend to be valid" YOU WERE
LYING?
Since you ALREADY KNEW it was valid YOU WERE LYING.
Thus the challenge, which you are still
running from. What source, other than a blog, are you
citing
for
this
poll data? If it's a CNN poll, it should be easy to
produce...
Go find it:http://www.pollingreport.com/
Try not to LIE next time.
The funniest thing about you PG, is how you start your
indignant
rant
about how everyone else is LYING
I caught YOU lying in this post. No need to bring in anything
else
unless
you think you need help.
the moment you are cornered on your lie.
What lie of mine? There is none here.
Go find the Poll here:http://www.pollingreport.com/
Try not to LIE next time.
Well then, PG, the way out of your embarassing situation is
simple.
Simply produce a link to the actual poll.
I did, twice already. For the third time.....
Go find the Poll here:http://www.pollingreport.com/
Pollingreport is a blog without links.
No. Its not a blog. It has a bunch of links.
You claim it's a CNN poll, let's see a CNN link to the data,
Go
here:http://websearch.cnn.com/websearch/search?source=cnn&eref=homesearch&...
Wow... a random list of search results....some from last year..still
no link to the poll you claim CNN did.
I think CNN Search results are in date order, newest to oldest.
For the fourth time.....
Go find the Poll here:http://www.pollingreport.com
The more you post, the more it
appears you are not simply a dupe, but a busted liar.
For the fifth time.....
Go find the Poll here:http://www.pollingreport.com
how embarassing for you
I found it. SilentOtis found it. Trust me, I'm not embarassed but
you're
looking pretty stupid....
So long as you don't, the perfectly valid header
announcing it is a fake remains.
Except another poster already found it with no trouble. The other
poster
quoted from it with no trouble.
Wake up. The only LIAR here is you......
So sorry. Did I hurt your feelings?
If you don't want to be a caught liar don't lie.
For the sixth time.....
Go find the Poll here:http://www.pollingreport.com
Hee Hee Hee (poor PG sur WISHES he could find an actual link to the
CNN poll). That's gotta hurt.
For the seventh time.....
Go find the Poll here:http://www.pollingreport.com
It's not his job to search websites in order to confirm your claims,
rightard.
|
YOU already confirmed it.
His job, evidently, is to be a public fool.
| Quote: |
Are you too stupid to link to the correct page?
Nevermind.
The answer to that is obvious...
|
Yes, the answer is that Tomato is a lying idiot who MUST work for it... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Patriot Games
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Catholic Democrats Risk Excommunication - Pope |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:f2a4e6$lc5$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
| Quote: |
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> writes:
"Gray Shockley" <grayshockley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C26C610500136269F0182648@news.giganews.com...
{...}
It's been so many decades since I took all those "Philosophy of
Religion" classes that - at that time - Judaism was the only major
monotheistic religion in the United States.
Judaism has NEVER been a major religion in the US.
Not what he said: Gray said it was the largetst monotheistic
religion.
And in that he was correct.
|
I get it, you're playing word games. You think Christianity isn't
monotheistic... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Democrat Jim Webb's Son Served In Iraq Re: HOW MANY DIRE |
|
|
On May 14, 1:32 am, "theloneranger...@aol.com"
<theloneranger...@aol.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 13, 8:42?pm, "COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 13, 10:33 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:
On May 13, 8:14 pm, "COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 13, 9:30 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:
On May 13, 4:45 pm, "edi...@netpath.net" <edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
On May 13, 6:34 pm, tom...@aol.com wrote:
Can someone verify for me if any of the following neo-con cheerleaders
for the Iraq slush-fund have children who have served in Iraq?
? ?Has Algore's son? ?Has Chelsea Klinton? ?Has Ted >Kennedy's son?
While Al Gore's son didn't serve, he himself served in Vietnam. ?Ted
Kennedy even did a stint in the Reserves (his brother Joe died in
WWII, which his other brother John was decorated for his service in).
We all know Clinton's story, but somehow we give a pass to Cheney for
doing far worse. ?But again, it was the neo-con's, not the war
opponents, who went to all lengths to get us into this mess, so why is
your question relevant.
Democratic Senator Jim Webb's son is a Marine serving in Iraq.
Have you been able to come up with any key neo-con war cheerleaders
with kids in the fight yet?
Get out of denial; the kids of the Marie Antoinette class of America
(politicians, top bureaucrats, "mainstream" media talkingheads) aren't
toting rifles around Fallujah - regardless of what party Dad or Mom is
high up in!
No $4 to park! ?No $6 admission! ?http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -
In an all- volunteer military environment, why does anybody have to
answer to the likes of a nobody such as you as to why they did or did
not join the military. ?Post your fucking credentials, just like the
other lefty-loons around here are always demanding the same of The
Colonel. ?
For the 2nd time: ?U.S. Army 82nd Airborne 11B1P, with assignments to
Ft. Benning, GA ('87-8 , Vicenza, Italy ('88-91) and Dihok, Iraq
('91).
For the last time, your posts are nothing more than type-written words
on an obscure Usenet group. ?That's the whole reason we don't bother
with specifics - they're meaningless to those who don't want to
believe it.
Put up or shut up, you cowardly, traitorous piece of shit AKA
TheLoneRanger. ?Your bluff is called.
Now we're "The Lone Ranger". ?Who's bluffing who here, you ignorant
dweeb. ?If you had one iota of Internet moxy, you could easily
ascertain in a matter of minutes that the Ranger and myself are two
different posters. ?But nobody ever said you were smart.
For years you have impersonated an officer of the United States
Military. ?If you want to suggest otherwise, all that is needed is for
you to name your command as a Colonel and the dates you held it.
You sound angry. ?A real vet knows how to channel his hostilities and
turn them into strengths. ?BTW, I'm a retired officer, asshole.
My, my, my.........The Leftist Pukes are getting "Hostile",
Colonel..........They've run OUT of
STEAM..........Heehee.............And if we keep them All Riled Up
they'll Keep FUCKING UP..........That's EXACTLY where we want
them...........Donchaknow............-
|
"TheLoneRanger": A fictional character from televsion who exibited
bravery that those too cowardly to actually fight live vicariously
through.
"Col. Bill Killgore": A fictional character from a movie who exibited
bravery that those too cowardly to actually fight live vicariously
through.
what a coincidence. What a PATHETIC DISGRACEFUL coincidence...
| Quote: |
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text - |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
hopeful
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Republicans: Are our troops less important than your pri |
|
|
"KODIAK" <dx@dgd.net> wrote in message
news:5P%1i.8034$2v1.5429@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| Quote: |
"Captain America" <america.captain@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:QsWdnSx-9vXZG9XbnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com...
Then why does Republican backed private contractors (Halliburton,
Blackwater) make more per year, have better vehicles, and better weapons?
I guess the 50 million people like you and me investing in these companies
should give it all back?
Capn' Asswipe... you're such a fucking narrow-minded dorkwad.
Blackwater is privately held, owned by a rabid prok-eating zionist that |
thinks he is a Christian. Actually don't give it back just sell the stocks
in the mercenary companies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
dianaiad
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Romney Says Nigger Sharpton is a Nappy-Haired Bigot Ho |
|
|
On May 14, 9:30 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 14, 11:17 am, dianaiad <diana...@msn.com> wrote:
On May 14, 7:59 am, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I can understand the problem of those examining the work, though. It
has to be easier to figure that Joseph Smith was a literary genius
than that he actually got visited by an angel.
Ummmm....where are the plates or tablets of gold on which the the Book
of Mormon is supposedly written? Show them to me, carbon date them to
the time of Jesus, show me the language they were originally written
in. Otherwise, the whole thing looks like a scam or an hallucination.
The Book of Job has always been considered the greatest work of poetry
in Hebrew literature, the equivalent of Homer in Greek, Dante in
Italian or Shakespeare in English. My Hebrew is very limited, so I
can't fully appreciate this, but it is clearly poetry in much more
than a "chiasmatic" sense. It is rhythmic poetry, as are the Psalms,
Homer and Virgil. There does not appear to be any comparable poetry
in the Book of Mormon. But, I do agree that Joseph Smith had
considerable literary ability.
|
one who believes that Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon himself
would have to acknowledge that. Too bad that, even though Joseph also
wrote a great many other things, that 'considerable literary ability'
didn't shine in quite the same way. Styles do | | |
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
