Social Sciences Talk
Social Sciences Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Catholic Democrats Risk Excommunication - Pope
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 1774, 1775, 1776  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Social Sciences Talk Forum Index -> Social Sciences Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Eli Grubman
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:33 am    Post subject: Re: Israel to swap prisoners with Hezbollah Wednesday Reply with quote

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:58:35 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seongf@gmail.com>
wrote:

Quote:

"charley" <varrick57@aol.com> wrote in message
news:03ec7234-761f-4270-82b4-9bd8154d8bdc@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 8:50 pm, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
"charley" <varric...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:ecd04927-da64-406c-b6de-bb2c6d88989b@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 10:24 am, "B. H. Cramer" <Iyamh...@themoment.yo> wrote:



"charley" <varric...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:5621e2e1-924c-4999-846f-e97a9176a8fb@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 12:44 am, Eli Grubman <eli.grub...@googlemail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:17:33 -0700 (PDT), charley <varric...@aol.com
wrote:

On Jul 16, 3:33 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:57:57 +1000, "Seon Ferguson"
seo...@gmail.com
wrote:

"Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.Com> wrote in message
news:4qdp74tj1pmmm9c4bf9i5fdpo76rcdd7jp@4ax.com...
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:41:34 +1000, "Seon Ferguson"
seo...@gmail.com
wrote:
"Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.Com> wrote in message
news:v4vm74lps113nc10j8kj3kstp0nt5h36k1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:54:20 -0700 (PDT),
everonlyn...@yahoo.com
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080713/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_lebanon
Be ever watchful though, members of Hezbollah.. the Israeli SS
has
been known to pull some tricks in those last 2 days before
such
exchanges in the past.
I have my fingers crossed hoping the Israelis will open fire
and
kill
a few dozen of the scuzzy muzzies!
Nazi.
Now we know who the REAL Nazis are:
Who oppressed Jewish religious freedom in Germany? Nazis.
Who oppressed Christian religious freedom in America? Democrats.
Who consolidated all state security organizations in Germany?
Nazis.
Who consolidated all state security organizations in America?
Democrats.
Who confiscated firearms in Germany? Nazis.
Who confiscated firearms in America? Democrats.
Who banned firearms in Germany? Nazis.
Who banned firearms in America? Democrats.
Who wants to ban firearms in America, again? Democrats.
Now we know who the REAL Nazis are.
Democrats = Nazis.
Remember that next time you vote.
Well I was stupid enough to reply...

But smart enough not try to defend the Nazi Democrats...

Anyone that goes against Israel is a traitor to the US.

'Israel' is an enemy of the US.

Eli
No you and your enabling of arab terrorism is the real threat to the
US.

You aren't very bright are you.

Before israel was your friend, you had no enemies in the Middle East.
Neither are you and your raghead buddies. With all the Arab nations
pulling together they still couldn't defeat Israel and by the way we
have squashed your Al Qaeda buddies in Iraq. Sux to be a muzzie now a
days.

Question: so if Israel kicks so much ass why should America help them
attack
Iran? cant they handle the problem themselves?

Show me anywhere we have helped or said we would help. I'm sure we'll
assist them in some ways but I feel secure Israel can do it. Not just
saying that to flame you but I think they have the wherewithal to
succeed. You can't let a psycho country like Iran have a nuke. Hell
even the most liberal of democrats don't want that to happen. In that
case you know everyone is serious. God does bless the Jew and he also
blesses the IDF who makes freedom in Israel a reality. All I can do
is keep sending $100 every month to the IFCJ organization and continue
buying Israeli war bonds through my church which I do now. As a
Christian it is my duty to support Israel's right to exist. That's
all....they should be allowed to exist.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
They didnt say that but they are brainwashed nut's who want to invade Iran.

Plural's don't take apostrophe's, Shorn.

Eli
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ed Cregger
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:34 am    Post subject: Re: Six Africans Beat White Man Protecting His Daughter At A Reply with quote

"the Bede" <rspwsownthebede@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_%Pfk.2897$bN2.1695@bignews9.bellsouth.net...
Quote:

yeah, they all settled in the Transvaal where there had NEVER EVER IN A
BILLION YEARS been a single Hottentot.

-------------

Yeah, but folks forget that the whites are distant relatives of all other
human beings. It shouldn't make any difference what color the skin is
anyway.

I know. Some folks just enjoy hating folks. If it wasn't skin color, it
would be eye color, hair color, religion, degreed or non degreed, northerner
or southerner, etc.

All this demonstrates that most folks have too much free time on their
hands, but that is about to end with home heating oil getting perilously
close to $5 a gallon.

I'm a confirmed xenophobe. I hate those damned aliens. 8>)


Ed Cregger
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Day Brown
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:34 am    Post subject: Re: Nuclear Power Can Help Climate Change! Reply with quote

MuttonJeff wrote:

Quote:
The root of all the world'sproblems is overpopulation. The mother
planet cannot sustain so many hungry,needy,greedy human beings.
Agreed, but we dont need genocide. What we can do is bribe poor stupid

women to go to fertility clinics to accept much more promising DNA.

They will find its gonzo easier to raise smart kids and vastly more
rewarding later on. The smart ones will make enuf money to take good
care of mom. There are innumerable reports of successful 19th century
men who dearly loved their old nannies, of whatever race, and took good
care of them even tho the women were not that bright. Maternal instincts
work really well anyway.

We have too many that are too stupid and crazy and we need a lot more
who are sane and smart to deal with the case loads. We will also need as
many innovative minds as we can get, and that is in the DNA of the smart
creative people we already have, who are often too busy to sire kids.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Day Brown
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Re: Obam Hires 300 idiots to tell him what to say & think ! Reply with quote

Shit Throwing Democrap Protester wrote:
Quote:


July 18, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/us/politics/18advisers.html?_r=2&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin

Cast of 300 Advises Obama on Foreign Policy
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
WASHINGTON - Every day around 8 a.m., foreign policy aides at Senator
Barack Obama's Chicago campaign headquarters send him two e-mails: a
briefing on major world developments over the previous 24 hours and a
set of questions, accompanied by suggested answers, that the candidate
is likely to be asked about international relations during the day.

One recent Q. & A. asked, for example, whether Mr. Obama supported the
decision by Iraq's prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, to include a
timetable for American troop withdrawal in any new security agreements
with the United States. The answer, provided to Mr. Obama with bullet
points, was yes - or "a genuine opportunity," as he put it in a speech
on Iraq this week.

Behind the e-mail messages is a tight-knit group of aides supported by a
huge 300-person foreign policy campaign bureaucracy

In any case, its always wise for a leader to know what fools think. He

mite not like it, but at least he knows. Which Bush being a fool
himself, does not bother to find out.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Day Brown
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Re: Can the impending GOP Tax Cut Depression Beat Hoover's G Reply with quote

orangatang1@googlemail.com wrote:
Quote:
unfortuantly interventionism does not work. i wish it did, but it does
not. it did not work in the thirties. it did not work in the
seventies. liquidations and foreclosures are necessary to correct
imbalances in the economy. sorry, but that's just the way it is.
Up to a point. But people are not all that rational, and when so many

get laid off from all these they spill out into the streets, and then
you have a revolution with some demagogue taking power.

He will, as Machiavelli (know who he is?) explains, will seize the
remaining assets of the rich to gratify the desire for revenge on the
part of the masses. I'm sorry, but that's just the way it is.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Day Brown
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Re: US: Into The Abyss Reply with quote

lorad wrote:
Quote:
They do us a favor..
We move on to ethanol.. where we should have been all along.
As Henry Ford building his Model-Ts first planned to fuel american
vehicles..with ethanol.
As Studebaker built trucks to run on ethanol..

Let them stew in their oil.. we won't need it.

6% of all US cars are already ethanol (flex-fuel) capable.
Let's make that 96%... and all our problems will be solved.
I was born on a farm and know a thing or two about raising corn. I've

raised quite a bit of it. You are not going to get 155 bu/acre without
tractor fuel and agribusiness petrochemicals... that come from oil

I have a record from 1885, and they got 21 bu/acre. I remember county
fair plaques on the wall in 1948-50 for bumper crops of 45-48 bu/acre.
That was using what we now call "organic" methods and doing it in soil
that had never been abused by agribusiness.

If you want ethanol, raise sorghum; it dont need nearly the fertilizer
and dont have nearly the problem with pests. A U of GA study showed I
can, in No Arkansas, get 100-120 gallons of ethanol using only 3.5
gallons of tractor fuel.

And whereas the sour mash process produces isopropyl, which is why
moonshine is poison, fermenting sorghum juice makes rum. Every farmer
would have a roadside stand selling jugs you can drive on or drink and
the BATF would schitt a brick.

Pick one: driving or the BATF.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Day Brown
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Re: Neither presidential candidate for '08 is a worthwhile c Reply with quote

V wrote:
Quote:
Neither presidential candidate for '08 is a worthwhile choice for what
faces America.
Its too late for anybody. Gibbon:"While it is necessary to maintain the

morals to keep a republic, every effort to restore them once lost has
failed." There's been no exceptions since.

Where do you plan to spend the revolution? Or will you be part of the
grand die off?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


strabo
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Re: Second Amendment:"Iran has the right to develop Nuclear Reply with quote

Michael Price wrote:
Quote:
On Jul 17, 6:19 am, strabo <str...@flashlight.net> wrote:
snipped
Anything else, would be hypocrisy.
You are a silly dunderhead.. as well as a Stalin devote'
The 2nd ammendment only applies to US citizens.
Nope, applies to everybody. All rights under the US constitution
apply to everyone because they are inherent.
You're 50% correct.

The philosophy of unalienable Rights, organic and natural laws,
are inherent to all men but the obligation of the BOR is the
demand of the American people that *their* government not infringe
*American* Rights.

Nope, it says the right shall not be infringed or that congress make
no law that infringes it. It doesn't say anywhere that the congress
can infringe it as long as the infringement only affects non-citizens.


It didn't say that it did. I said that the philosophy applied
to all men, not American jurisdiction.


Quote:

The USA has no obligation or authority to rule the world.

Never said it did. However it does have an obligation not to
infringe the rights described under the BOR, including those
of non-citizens of the USA.


I think we are in agreement here.


Quote:
The BOR is a tripwire. Once government servants fail to keep
their oaths, the People may oust them form government or dump
the government itself.



The pertinent prohibition of nukes for Iran fall under the
jurisdiction of the International Non-Proliferation Treaty.
..which, BTW, says that any nation can develop nuclear power plants -
if it wishes to do so.

----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.pronews.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Eli Grubman
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:36 am    Post subject: Re: Israel to swap prisoners with Hezbollah Wednesday Reply with quote

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:04:54 +1000, "B. H. Cramer"
<Iyamh're@themoment.yo> wrote:

Quote:

"Eli Grubman" <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:knc084toos84kv4rmubak32ppg317oc5l0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:59:39 -0700 (PDT), charley <varrick57@aol.com
wrote:

On Jul 17, 7:57 pm, "B. H. Cramer" <Iyamh...@themoment.yo> wrote:
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kim...@rcn.com> wrote in message

news:DtCdnQecmfJd_OLVnZ2dnUVZ_ojinZ2d@rcn.net...





a-little-sanity>; "please" <ratio...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:g5nl4d$et5$1@pcls6.std.com...
In article <f9ydnffPiLIhyOLVnZ2dnUVZ_r3in...@giganews.com>,
B. H. Cramer <Iyamh...@themoment.yo> wrote:

The Arabs had been living there for centuries before the yids
swiped
Palestine.

Not true. Hardly anyone lived there.

It was NEVER the yid's homeland.

Actually it was. But you're Australian. How did your ancestors get
there? Oh wait. They invaded it, and killed the folks who were
there before. Seems like a double standard, aye mate?

Actually it was a penal colony. His ancestors were rapists, thieves
and
cutthroats.

Hello kimmelstein. Still spraying lies about with gay abandon, I see.

How's the health, you fat fuck? I've heard you've been unwell.



Only a muslim would have this much disdain for the Jew.

The whole world has had disdain for the jew for the past 3000 years.
Wherever the jew surfaces, 'anti-semitism'® follows as surely as night
follows day.

Ain't that the truth.

Semitism is the cause of anti-Semitism.

The *only* cause.

Eli
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John Galt
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:36 am    Post subject: Re: Oil Companies Should Drill on Land They Already Have Reply with quote

<forbisgaryg@msn.com> wrote in message
news:5dbb135e-41a6-4f4b-abfb-40db614c7b01@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 8:07 pm, "John Galt" <kady...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
forbisga...@msn.com> wrote in message
Even T. Boone Pickens has come to realize oil isn't the only answer
to our energy needs and if it were we'd be in a world of hurt. When
the same effort could be spent for greater gains why is the
destruction of nature more important to you?

[JG] OK, now we've already devolved into a red herring battle, I see. I go
to the good trouble of writing a very even tempered and reasoned post and
you can't even manage a civil reply.

But, at least we now know where you're coming from. To you, anyone who
wants
to drill has as their real purpose the "destruction of nature." Got it.
Very
balanced, that viewpoint. Good for America. We're all going to get along
just fine, I see.

I've cautioned you before about your news responses. The least you
could
do is to get order correct.

{JG} However you're posting, my newsreader doesn't add '>' to your prose
when I respond to your posts. It does for nearly everyone else. I have no
intention of installing entirely different software to rectify the problem.
Keep your "caution" to yourself and let's move on. Sometimes life isn't
perfect. (I'm sitting in a hotel room in Delhi right now, and all you have
to do is look out the window to see how 'not perfect' it is.)

What you assert is a response was their
prior
to your prior article. That you took it as a response to you
indicates the
problem once again. It doesn't fall to me to correct the attributions
you mess up.

[JG] Then that will have to be the case, then. We have a technical problem.

Not all costs and benefits are monetary.

{JG] Costs and benefits are always monetary. There may be extenuating
circustances which lead people to make decisions that transcend a pure
cost/benefit analysis, and one of those may be an interest in, for example,
keeping a particular site off limits to exploration for environmental
reasons. I have no objection to that position.

Different people have
different values.
Its ironic for you to filter my comments as "To you, anyone who wants
to drill has as their real purpose the 'destruction of nature'" after
having written
"let's be clear: the only 'future generations' that ANWR is being
preserved for
is caribou and bears."

[JG] Which is precisely true, and irrefutable.

In general, when someone writes "you" in response to one of my
articles
or my words I take the comment personally. You can avoid this by
writing
in a way that makes your thoughts more clear. For instance you could
write "Radical Environmentalists" when that is what you mean and
reserve
"you" when you do indeed mean me.

[JG] I did not use the term "you". Here is my precise quote:

"Parties at the extremes of their ideologies (e.g., "no energy development
anywhere under any circumstances" and "screw the environment" are free to
lobby their respresentatives, but don't get seats at the table, because both
extremes are simply bad for America."

Not only is the term "you" not used, but both extremes were treated with
equal disdain in my quotation.

I'll take your apology at any time.

JG




As you said ANWR is just a political football. This is the political
season.
I guess I should expect politics as usual. This isn't about solving
our
national needs. It's about politics.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Screen Barret
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:36 am    Post subject: Re: Obam Hires 300 idiots to tell him what to say & think ! Reply with quote

"Lubow" <dynamitemike@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d6950713-db23-4701-8177-45971778c701@z16g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
So the difference between Obama and Bush is that 300 people
attempt to
tell Obama what to do while only "Dick" Cheney tells Pres. Bush
what
to do.

-- Lubow


Why can't his parents find him a better name? "Dick" sounds dirty
and fuckable person......Donchaknow?...........
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Foxtrot
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:36 am    Post subject: Re: Obama's Plan for Iraq Reply with quote

"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@intheshadows.com> wrote:

Quote:
Ralph wrote:
He'll flip-flop if he gets elected, sorta like Bill
Clinton said, "I
didn't say I wouldn't RAISE taxes on the middle class."

He didn't.

Oh really Cransdunce?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/bill-clinton-on.html

In 1993, newly-elected President Bill Clinton raised gas taxes
4.3 cents a gallon.

I guess the middle class doesn't buy gas eh? Geez you libs
are dumber than a pile of dog shit.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Kommienezuspadt
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:37 am    Post subject: Re: Obama: How DARE You Talk About My Wife??? Reply with quote

"Force Majeure" <ForceMajeure@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.22e9c6ae8132221f98ae32@news.individual.net...
Quote:
Kommienezuspadt <NoSpam@NoThanks.net> wrote:
Do you want us to talk about Cindy McCain & her stealing drugs from her
own
charity to feed her own addiction?

Yeah, but Obama's wife is black and carries an AK 47 around, wearing an
Angela Davis afro hairdo while warming her hands to a burning Old Glory in
the fireplace.

One day Americans are gonna get wise to the truth about Obama.

stealing drugs from the mouths of pain suffering children --- now that is a
pretty picture....
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Panta Rhei
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:37 am    Post subject: Re: Israel to swap prisoners with Hezbollah Wednesday Reply with quote

Eli Grabmen, the notorious rabid anti-Semite, aka trolling Jewdas, aka dumb
Rever'nerd, aka stalking fake Susan, etc., etc. in Jewish newsgroups,
writes:


Quote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:58:35 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seongf@gmail.com
wrote:


"charley" <varrick57@aol.com> wrote in message
news:03ec7234-761f-4270-82b4-9bd8154d8bdc@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 8:50 pm, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
"charley" <varric...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:ecd04927-da64-406c-b6de-bb2c6d88989b@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 10:24 am, "B. H. Cramer" <Iyamh...@themoment.yo> wrote:



"charley" <varric...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:5621e2e1-924c-4999-846f-e97a9176a8fb@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 12:44 am, Eli Grubman <eli.grub...@googlemail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:17:33 -0700 (PDT), charley <varric...@aol.com
wrote:

On Jul 16, 3:33 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:57:57 +1000, "Seon Ferguson"
seo...@gmail.com
wrote:

"Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.Com> wrote in message
news:4qdp74tj1pmmm9c4bf9i5fdpo76rcdd7jp@4ax.com...
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:41:34 +1000, "Seon Ferguson"
seo...@gmail.com
wrote:
"Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.Com> wrote in message
news:v4vm74lps113nc10j8kj3kstp0nt5h36k1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:54:20 -0700 (PDT),
everonlyn...@yahoo.com
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080713/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_lebanon
Be ever watchful though, members of Hezbollah.. the Israeli SS
has
been known to pull some tricks in those last 2 days before
such
exchanges in the past.
I have my fingers crossed hoping the Israelis will open fire
and
kill
a few dozen of the scuzzy muzzies!
Nazi.
Now we know who the REAL Nazis are:
Who oppressed Jewish religious freedom in Germany? Nazis.
Who oppressed Christian religious freedom in America? Democrats.
Who consolidated all state security organizations in Germany?
Nazis.
Who consolidated all state security organizations in America?
Democrats.
Who confiscated firearms in Germany? Nazis.
Who confiscated firearms in America? Democrats.
Who banned firearms in Germany? Nazis.
Who banned firearms in America? Democrats.
Who wants to ban firearms in America, again? Democrats.
Now we know who the REAL Nazis are.
Democrats = Nazis.
Remember that next time you vote.
Well I was stupid enough to reply...

But smart enough not try to defend the Nazi Democrats...

Anyone that goes against Israel is a traitor to the US.

'Israel' is an enemy of the US.

Eli
No you and your enabling of arab terrorism is the real threat to the
US.

You aren't very bright are you.

Before israel was your friend, you had no enemies in the Middle East.
Neither are you and your raghead buddies. With all the Arab nations
pulling together they still couldn't defeat Israel and by the way we
have squashed your Al Qaeda buddies in Iraq. Sux to be a muzzie now a
days.

Question: so if Israel kicks so much ass why should America help them
attack
Iran? cant they handle the problem themselves?

Show me anywhere we have helped or said we would help. I'm sure we'll
assist them in some ways but I feel secure Israel can do it. Not just
saying that to flame you but I think they have the wherewithal to
succeed. You can't let a psycho country like Iran have a nuke. Hell
even the most liberal of democrats don't want that to happen. In that
case you know everyone is serious. God does bless the Jew and he also
blesses the IDF who makes freedom in Israel a reality. All I can do
is keep sending $100 every month to the IFCJ organization and continue
buying Israeli war bonds through my church which I do now. As a
Christian it is my duty to support Israel's right to exist. That's
all....they should be allowed to exist.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
They didnt say that but they are brainwashed nut's who want to invade Iran.

Plural's don't take apostrophe's, Shorn.

Eli

But punching bag's like you take their daily punche's, you sick asshole!


--
Rev. Richard Skull about Eli Grabmen: Any sex act involving YOU is
bestiality.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Gunner
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:37 am    Post subject: Re: Second Amendment:"Iran has the right to develop Nuclear Reply with quote

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:03:57 -0800, pyotr filipivich
<phamp@mindspring.com> wrote:

Quote:
[Default] I missed the Staff Meeting but the Minutes record that
Gunner <gunner@NOSPAM.lightspeed.net> reported Elvis on Tue, 15 Jul
2008 19:59:02 -0700 in misc.survivalism :
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:54:31 -0800, pyotr filipivich
phamp@mindspring.com> wrote:

[Default] I missed the Staff Meeting but the Minutes record that
Gunner <gunner@NOSPAM.lightspeed.net> reported Elvis on Sun, 13 Jul
2008 11:02:34 -0700 in misc.survivalism :
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:11:56 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:

A weak homeless man with mental issues pulls out a tiny pen knife and
staggers toward a group of big healthy armed cops.

The cops could easily disarm the homeless man but instead will shoot
him dozens of times and at most the cops will get 3 days paid leave
and no one will raise an eyebrow.

The homeless man made a mistake and he paid for it?

Why should Israel be expected to treat Iran any differently than big
city cops treat the delirious-homeless?

An Israeli strike on Iranian nuke facilities would be a much more
balanced and appropriate approach.

Even if the Iranians claim they were misunderstood about wiping Israel
off the face of the earth, well, some individuals are too stupid to
stay out of the way of trains and some countries are just too
inarticulate to survive on this planet.

Under the individual - nation / cop - homeless analogue, even if the
Iranians are 50 years away from developing A bombs which is probably
the case, why wouldn't Israel still be 100% justified in annihilating
all Iranians?


Bret Cahill

All Iranians? CROM! That would close down 3/4 of all the 7-11s in
Souther California!

Damn, then the Mexicans would have to take over another sector
where Americans don't want to work. Can Mexico afford to export so
many hard workers?
Maybe we should outsource the 7-11s to the Indians.

No can do..the Indians have the motel concession.

And the Indians have the casino concessions, so they're busy.

Do you think the Iranians could outsource it to Americans?


tschus
pyotr


Do the Elbonians have any gigs going on at the moment?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Social Sciences Talk Forum Index -> Social Sciences Talk All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 1774, 1775, 1776  Next
Page 1775 of 1776

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding
Escorts Incalll and Outcall in Modena, Bologna, Parma, Ferrara, Forli' ...
Swingers and Swinging
Photoshop
loan
Make Your Own Website
Cheap phone calls to Saudi Arabia
Cleaning Service
toxic mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
cleaning supplies
Vacuum Parts


Board Security

201 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group